Brexiteers punish the BBC for helping them deliver Brexit!

There’s probably no one who is more despairing about the BBC’s news and current affairs output in recent years than me. Indeed, I’ve been calling this once great public service broadcaster the Brexit Broadcasting Company for the past 6 years as its obsession with Farage and his like was a significant reason, at least to my mind, for Brexit being delivered. Of course, Labour’s right-wing, working-class voters were the other significant reason.

Left of centre progressives, like me, have good reason to want the BBC to be reformed so that it can retake the ground it once held as a suburb and fearless public service broadcaster. BUT incredibly the very Brexiteer politicians who must have been cheering the BBC from the rooftops during its biased coverage of the now-infamous referendum and the lead up to it have turned on the BBC in an attempt to bring it to their right-wing political heal. Their reason; the BBC are too left-wing! What?????

The BBC needs to be an institution feared by all politicians as it is not there to cheerlead any of them but to hold them all to account. The government of the UK (any government) is not held to account at all well in my view and frankly neither are the opposition. How many times have you heard leading politicians say something on the TV news which is pretty much the opposite of what they’d said previously? It happens a lot but superficial news coverage often lets them get away with it. I get it with commercial news and current affairs stations as they’ll often only play with headline news items but it’s taken Channel 4 News to step up to be what the BBC used to be. I shudder to think how superficial UK news output, in general, would be without Channel 4 News, and you know it often hits home as politicians fear and even boycott it.

So why have the Brexiteers turned against the BBC? Well as Brexit has pretty much proved to be the economic and trading setback it was always likely to be and the BBC has been edging towards being critical of it the Brexiteers have taken the hump. Anything their ears find unacceptable is leftie nonsense; facts have no place in the mad world of the Brexiteers. And again Starmer’s lot find themselves compromised and fence-sitting as Labour knows only too well that if they look too anti-Brexit those right-wing, working-class, white voters will stick with the Tories. Trying to be anti-Tory but pro-Brexit and pro-right wing continues to dog Labour as it’s an unholy compromise position to be in.

So will the right-wing succeed in finishing off the BBC? Frankly, it depends on who is Johnson’s successor and how far they are prepared to go to shut down opposition in the UK. We are drifting towards an authoritarian state where the right to protest is curtailed. Control of the media to make it compliant is a path we are sadly already on and if like me, you fear politicians being able to direct the media then we have a lot to be concerned about………

One thought on “Brexiteers punish the BBC for helping them deliver Brexit!

  1. Phil Holden says:

    Oh dear, Tony, I fear you are even more paranoid than I am!
    I’d be interested to know if there is any independent academic study of the Beeb’s Brexit coverage. Personally I thought they tried to be even handed but their natural individual inclinations (I’d be amazed if their journalists were less than 80% remain) caused some inevitable skew if only by tone of voice and facial expression (yes, of course I mean Huw Edwards but not just him). It was beyond parody how on the radio all the pro Brexit vox pop in the referendum campaign seemed to come from stereotypical thick sounding northerners. Brexit supporters from business and finance were rarely featured, in contrast to Remain.
    So of course, on an individual level, most of the BBC probably expects Brexit to turn out badly though actually I recall very few stories on those lines.
    As for the changes to the BBC’s funding I think the licence fee model is unsustainable and the decision (if it is a decision) was overdue. Personally I would be prepared to pay £200 a year for the current service level, i.e. more than the current licence fee. I don’t see why people who never consume any BBC product (ie the majority of people under 40?) should pay anything for it. It’s a tax and it shouldn’t be funded that way. The decision might have been a red meat offering but that just made them grasp a nettle they’ve been waving at for a decade or so. About time

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.