Lydiate – Residents protest against 3 storey block of flats for Saville Road

A large number of residents attended the public session of Lydiate Parish Council’s meeting last night in Lydiate Village Centre. They were there to raise concerns and objections to a recent planning application to build a 3 storey block of flats on the site of derelict garages off Saville Road to the rear of the row of shops on Liverpool Road.

Rear of the Liverpool Road shops on Saville Road. The proposed flats would be adjacent to them if Sefton gives planning permission.

The site is surrounded on 3 sides by bungalows and 2 storey houses so the fact that the application is for a 3 storey building means that overlooking of the neighbouring properties is a big concern.

Another concern is lack of adequate car parking facilities for the development in an area where on-road parking is hard to find at times due to the shops and commercial premises on Liverpool Road.

I must admit when I first became aware of the plan a few days ago my first thought was along the lines of you surely can’t shoehorn that many flats into that small space and anyway a 3 storey building is inappropriate for the site. My 2nd thought was I wonder if the applicant is applying for a 3 storey block thinking they are likely to be knocked back to 2 storeys via the planning process by Sefton Council Planners?

The Parish Council decided to recommend refusal of the application to Sefton Council’s Planning Committee. However, the Parish Council does NOT have the final say; that is in the hands of Sefton’s Planning Committee, so anyone wanting to raise concerns about the application needs to write into Sefton Council ASAP.

Here’s a link to the planning application on Sefton Council’s website:-

pa.sefton.gov.uk/online-applications/simpleSearchResults.do?action=firstPage

Lydiate – Armed Robbery

www.southportvisiter.co.uk/news/southport-west-lancs/police-appeal-after-armed-robbery-11934910

The Southport Visiter has the story on its web site – see link above

Only days after my most recent blog posting about gun crime (18th September) on Merseyside and in particular in Sefton Borough – see link below –

tonyrobertson.mycouncillor.org.uk/2016/09/18/gun-crime-in-sefton-just-in-case-we-wondered-if-it-was-under-control/

this happens in Lydiate!

As an observer of public life across Merseyside I am becoming increasingly concerned about the number of shootings and gun crime incidents that seem to be taking place. It was not so long ago that Merseyside Police were giving the impression that they were getting on top of shootings/gun crime but it seems that view is now looking far too optimistic with the benefit of hindsight. A link back that more optimistic time (some 6 months ago) is below:-

tonyrobertson.mycouncillor.org.uk/2016/03/02/merseyside-gun-crime-the-stats-say-things-are-improving/

Without doubt gun crime is a big issue on Merseyside and we are all looking to Merseyside Police to get on top of it as soon as possible.

Lydiate – Sefton Council thought Oakhill Park had been privatised?

Now this is another odd story. You see at the March meeting of Lydiate Parish Council we had a report from Sefton Borough Council about their assessment of the quantity and quality of sports pitches in Lydiate that formed part of a Borough-wide assessment that is done every few years. The assessment covers schools and private sports grounds I would add, not just Council owned/managed facilities.

Oakhill Park bowls pavilion and greens

Oakhill Park bowls pavilion and greens

When it came to Lydiate’s Oakhill Park on Liverpool Road, Sefton Council had renamed it Oakhill Cottage Lane (name of the narrow lane running down one side of the park) and they had its management down as ‘Private’!

What’s surprising about this is that there is a notice on the bowls pavilion (there are two bowling greens on this park) which makes it very clear who owns/runs the park:-

IMG_7589

As to Sefton’s assessment of the park they say ‘Two crown greens assessed as good quality, likely to be able to accommodate additional members’. Well that seems about right, but what on earth made them think it was a private facility/park?