The Liverpool Echo has the story – see link above
We all want Liverpool Airport to do well but the reality is that it has been a money looser for many years. So when we hear that Liverpool City Council, which say it does not have a Penny to bless itself with, is about to put money into the potentially continuing black hole it makes you wonder.
What’s more it’s not so long ago (just 6 months actually) that KPMG the auditors for John Lennon Airport said, for want of better words, that it was then a struggling concern. See the link below from my colleague Andrew Makinson on Twitter:-
Spending large amounts of money on speculative investments and paying Joe Anderson’s legal fees whilst moaning that the City Council is all but broke indicates, at best, a confused lack of clear priority setting for the spending of the City Council’s scarce resources in my view.
The Liverpool Echo has the story – see link above.
The investment in the A5036 from Switch Island to Seaforth Docks is not detailed in the Echo story but then again it would seem that they (the Highways Agency) are not even close to a firm proposals position as yet i.e. they are still pondering upgrading the A5036 or putting a new road down the Rimrose Valley Country Park or indeed both! My previous post of a few days ago refers:-
By the way have you driven along the M57 (northbound carriageway) between the junction with the M62 and the Prescot turn off? If you have you will probably be thinking about those mounds of tarmac in the slow lane that have appeared in recent times. I assume they are meant to fill in potholes but they are are raised up well above the rest of the road surface and drivers can be seen trying to avoid them by weaving around them! Yes, I know, this is a motorway for goodness sake surely the Highways Agency can fix potholes properly, can’t they?
A few days after I published (see link below) on this very blog site issues of concern about the plodding nature of the process to identify and consult upon options to get traffic to and from this ever busier port the Champion newspaper carried the article below:-
It seems that the plodding nature of this process is set to continue as there is not going to be any public consultation for another 18 to 24 months. Makes you wonder what on earth the Highways Agency, Network Rail and Sefton Council have been doing about this matter for the past 2 or 3 years does it not.
I don’t know about you but I suspect it suits some folk to keep kicking this issue into the long grass – yes I am talking about the Bootle Labour Party here! But doing that simply means it will come back harder when the crunch really does hit. Labour have never wanted this aired in public as they fear what the folks who live around the A5036 and Rimrose valley Country Park will do to them!
I have been saying for a long time now that Sefton Council needs to be leading the debate and pushing for as much freight as possible to go by rail and in doing so get the mothballed Aintree – Bootle line opened up again. Apart from stopping development on this old trackbed in their draft Local Plan it looks like very little is actually being done by Sefton to lead the debate so the Highways Agency are doing their own thing.
I wonder if blaming the Highways Agency for an ‘unacceptable solution’ when it may be too late to change things is the tactic of Labour run Sefton Council?
Maybe a job for the press here to smoke the real story out.
Getting there slowly both in terms of the access project and the congestion.
The present Seaforth Docks and hinterland
The Liverpool Echo has the story of the construction – see link above.
BUT, what is happening with regard to how goods are going to get to and from the port when the new river berth has been constructed and is in use? The Echo article makes reference to transhipment down the Manchester Ship Canal but that is not where all the addition freight is going to go.
Sefton Council, The Highways Agency, Network Rail and Liverpool City Council have been ‘looking into this’ for years yet we know precious little about the proposed solutions that are actually going to be proposed. Yes there’s been a lot of talk and speculation but real hard facts on which residents living near to the port and along the A5036 corridor to Switch Island can be fully consulted upon is hard to find indeed.
Is the old Aintree – Bootle freight railway line, which has been mothballed for years, going to be opened up again?
Do the Council really want to drive a new road down the Rimrose Valley Country Park?
What are the noise and air pollution consequences going to be of hundreds of additional diesel powered lorries thundering through Seaforth, Litherland and Netherton?
Is it not about time all this was debated in the open so that we all know what’s going on?
The Liverpool Echo has the story – see link above.
It is interesting to see that Dunningsbridge Road is now officially classified as a ‘delay road’ something that regular users of it will not need to be told.
BUT with Seaforth Docks set to expand with a new river berth taking Post Panamax size ships the situation can only get worse!
Supposedly, in non-smoke filled rooms, Sefton Council, the Highways Agency, Network Rail etc. are beavering away at solutions but little is known of these deliberations. It’s about time the powers that be put their proposed solutions before us don’t you think?
Only a few days ago I got an e-mail from the Secretary of the umbrella organisation which covers the 10 Parish Councils in Sefton Borough It said:-
I have managed to secure a Special Meeting with [a representative] of Peel Holdings on Thursday 8th January, 2015 at 2pm. The Meeting will take place in the Council Chamber at Maghull Town Hall.
I would be grateful if as many of you as possible could attend, and if you could let me know in advance by email numbers of those attending.
That’s interesting I thought I will go along to hear what they have to say despite having huge concerns about their plan to concrete over vast tracts of Sefton’s Green Belt in Melling, which also happens to be some of the best agricultural land in England. It would be like listening to Peel justify the indefensible of course from my perspective!
Then on the 20th December I got another e-mail from the same source telling me that the Peel Holdings meeting had been postponed until further notice. I wonder why Peel backed out?
For those who share my concerns about Peel’s proposals you can find out about the local resident group set up to fight their plans at:-